Parand Tony Darugar wrote:
> If you take a look at the stuff that comes us at from some mod_perl
> camps, there's quite a bit more mud than we've ever thrown. There's
> the whole "VelociGen is based on mod_perl" thread. There's the
> benchmark that compares VelociGen with mod_perl and a couple of
> other solutions, and it shows us near the bottom in a very simple
> test. Now, you can run the tests yourself and see that VelociGen
> comes up near the top; heck, when we test, our solution is the
> fastest ;-)
>
> Anyway, both mod_perl and VelociGen work well. If we take the
> competitive analysis off the site, we get flamed for not doing
> the comparison. If we put it on the site, we upset some people.
> We've got Vivek's approval, which is about as much as we can do,
> I think.
>
Tony,
If you would like, you may submit your own VelociGen benchmark
numbers for listing at: http://www.chamas.com/hello_world.html
It would be helpful if you also submit another common benchmark
from the same box to help with the relative comparison.
This test should be reproducable by anyone who so desires, so
if you have a crippled demo version, your numbers may not look
so good to people testing your solution.
-- Joshua
