Not long ago, Jeffrey W. Baker proclaimed... > Postgres is very slow. In my experience it was never fast enough to > rise to the scale of the project. Oracle can run really quickly with > the right tuning and hardware, Actually, PostgreSQL is also very tuneable. Documentation for PostgreSQL is a bit lacking right now, but I understand there are books in the process of being published and online documentation is growing. IMO, Postgres is the closest thing you're going to get to Oracle without pulling out your checkbook. :-) -=Fozz -- Doran L. Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Iodynamics LLC -- "Internetworking the masses" <URL:http://www.iodynamics.com/>
- RE: oracle : The lowdown David Harris
- RE: oracle : The lowdown David Harris
- RE: oracle : The lowdown John Armstrong
- Re: oracle : The lowdown Jeffrey W. Baker
- RE: oracle : The lowdown Autarch
- RE: oracle : The lowdown Ian Mahuron
- Re: oracle : The lowdown Jeffrey W. Baker
- Re: oracle : The lowdown Tim Bunce
- Re: oracle : The lowdown Jeffrey W. Baker
- Re: oracle : The lowdown G.W. Haywood
- Re: oracle : The lowdown Doran L. Barton
- Re: oracle : The lowdown Bill
- RE: oracle : The lowdown Jeff Warner
- Re: oracle : The lowdown Keith G. Murphy
- Re: oracle : The lowdown Matt Sergeant
- Re: oracle : The lowdown Michael Peppler
- Re: oracle : The lowdown Matt Sergeant
- Re: oracle : The lowdown Michael
- Re: oracle : The lowdown Jeff Groves
- Re: oracle : The lowdown Matt Sergeant
- Re: oracle : The lowdown Greg Stark