On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, DeWitt Clinton wrote: [...] > On that topic, is there an alternative to squid? We are using it > exclusively as an accelerator, and don't need 90% of it's admittedly > impressive functionality. Is there anything designed exclusively for this > purpose? At ValueClick we can't use the caching for obvious reasons so we're using a bunch of apache/mod_proxy processes in front of the apache/mod_perl processes to save memory. Even with our average <1KB per request we can keep hundreds of mod_proxy childs busy with very few active mod_perl childs. - ask -- ask bjoern hansen - <http://www.netcetera.dk/~ask/> more than 60M impressions per day, <http://valueclick.com>
- RE: squid performance Vivek Khera
- Re: squid performance Greg Stark
- Re: squid performance Leslie Mikesell
- Re: squid performance Greg Stark
- Re: squid performance Leslie Mikesell
- Re: squid performance Greg Stark
- Re: squid performance Leslie Mikesell
- Re: squid performance Michael Alan Dorman
- Re: squid performance Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: squid performance Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: squid performance G.W. Haywood
- Re: squid performance Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: squid performance Greg Stark
- Re: squid performance Stas Bekman
- Re: squid performance Leslie Mikesell
- Re: squid performance jb
- RE: squid performance Gerald Richter
- Re: squid performance DeWitt Clinton
- RE: squid performance Markus Wichitill
- RE: squid performance Radu Greab