>>>>> "MS" == Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> adding handlers as easy as adding Registry scripts. I guess it is >> sort of an ultra-light-weight Registry, in some sense. MS> I've got something pretty similar. Let me know if you want some code. Sure; it is always good to see other ideas... Which handler phase did you tie into? I'm thinking just to go along the lines of Apache::Registry and use the content phase.
- [RFC] Transitioning from Apache::Registry to Apache han... Stas Bekman
- RE: [RFC] Transitioning from Apache::Registry to A... Chris Nokleberg
- RE: [RFC] Transitioning from Apache::Registry ... Stas Bekman
- RE: [RFC] Transitioning from Apache::Regis... Vivek Khera
- RE: [RFC] Transitioning from Apache::R... Stas Bekman
- RE: [RFC] Transitioning from Apache::R... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [RFC] Transitioning from Apac... Drew Taylor
- Re: [RFC] Transitioning from ... Vivek Khera
- RE: [RFC] Transitioning from Apac... Vivek Khera
- RE: [RFC] Transitioning from ... Matt Sergeant
- RE: [RFC] Transitioning from Apache::R... Doug MacEachern
- Re: [RFC] Transitioning from Apache::Registry to A... Doug MacEachern
- Re: [RFC] Transitioning from Apache::Registry ... Stas Bekman
- Re: [RFC] Transitioning from Apache::Regis... Doug MacEachern
- Re: [RFC] Transitioning from Apache::Registry ... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: [RFC] Transitioning from Apache::Regis... Doug MacEachern