[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Now with modperl the Perl garbage collector is > NEVER used. Because the reference count of those variables is never > decremented... it's because it's all in the registry, and it's hard to > tell... hmm... what should I throw away, and what should I keep? ;-). What I know about Perl internals could fit on the head of a pin, but this strikes me as a very odd statement. If the garbage collector is never used, why do my lexical variables go out of scope and get destroyed? There are mod_perl packages like Apache::Session that absolutely depend on garbage collection of lexical variables to work. Are you saying that destroying the variables and actually reclaiming the memory are separate, and only the first is happening? - Perrin
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memory usage. Stas Bekman
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memory usage. shane
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memory usage... Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memory u... Leslie Mikesell
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memo... Gunther Birznieks
- shrinking memory (was Re: Modperl/Apach... Stas Bekman
- Re: shrinking memory (was Re: Modperl/A... Doug MacEachern
- Re: shrinking memory (was Re: Modperl/A... Stas Bekman
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memo... Matt Sergeant
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memory u... shane
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memo... Perrin Harkins
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memo... shane
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memo... Jim Winstead
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memo... shane
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memo... shane
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memo... Jason Terry
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memo... shane
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memo... Ken Williams
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memo... Matt Sergeant
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memo... Jim Winstead
- Re: Modperl/Apache deficiencies... Memo... Perrin Harkins