Peter Haworth wrote:
>
> brian moseley wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 May 2000, Peter Haworth wrote:
> > > In light of the non-dependency on mod_perl, the
> > > Apache::Request::Form name is also out. I'd still rather
> > > not use the CGI::Form name, in case there are any
> > > current users whose interface would change, which is a
> > > shame, because that seems like the most appropriate
> > > name. Erk, any ideas, or proof that no-one uses the
> > > existing CGI::Form?
> >
> > HTML::Form? :)
>
> Well, duh! Why didn't I think of that? Unfortunately though, HTML::Form already
> exists, and doesn't really do the same kind of thing. How about HTML::FormGen?
How about HTML::StickyForm(s)?
> > > I'd prefer to stick with one style of interface, to keep
> > > things small and simple. Named parameters as above seem
> > > most flexible, and allow for unexpected things like
> > > omMouseOver attributes to be added easily. I'm inclined
> > > to only allow method style calls, although I suppose
> > > there's nothing wrong with allowing people to import the
> > > methods and call them like this:
> > >
> > > print textfield($form,name => 'name', ...);
> >
> > agree all the way.
>
> Good. Anyone disagree?
Nope. But I won't be calling it that way personally. :-)
--
Drew Taylor
Vialogix Communications, Inc.
501 N. College Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
704 370 0550
http://www.vialogix.com/
