On Tue, 23 May 2000, Perrin Harkins wrote: > Your sub &x is a closure. That's why it returns the previous value of No. In perl, a closure is *defined* as "anonymous subroutine" (see the documentation). If you define it different, you are right, but you are not talking about perl then. -- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |
- global variables and reparsing (short reproducible... Marc Lehmann
- Re: global variables and reparsing (short repr... Doug MacEachern
- Re: global variables and reparsing (short ... Marc Lehmann
- Re: global variables and reparsing (sh... Stas Bekman
- Re: global variables and reparsin... Marc Lehmann
- Re: global variables and repa... Perrin Harkins
- Re: global variables and repa... Marc Lehmann
- Re: global variables and repa... Doug MacEachern
- Re: global variables and reparsing (short repr... Perrin Harkins
- Re: global variables and reparsing (short ... Doug MacEachern
- Re: global variables and reparsing (sh... Marc Lehmann
- Re: global variables and reparsin... tayers
- Re: global variables and repa... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: global variables and repa... Stas Bekman
- Re: global variables and reparsing (short ... Marc Lehmann
- Re: global variables and reparsing (sh... Perrin Harkins
- Re: global variables and reparsin... Marc Lehmann
- Re: global variables and reparsin... Doug MacEachern
- Re: global variables and repa... Marc Lehmann
- Re: global variables and repa... Doug MacEachern
- Re: global variables and reparsing question (low priori... Gustavo Duarte