Eric Cholet wrote: > Of course the slowest stuff should be optimized first... Right. Which means the Guide, if it is not already so doing, ought to rank-order the optimizations in their order of importance, or better, their relative importance. This one, it appears, should be near the bottom of the list.
- [performance/benchmark] printing techniques Stas Bekman
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniques Matt Sergeant
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniques Stas Bekman
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniques Eric Cholet
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniqu... Eric Strovink
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing tech... Eric Cholet
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing... Matt Sergeant
- [OT] Re: [performance/benchmark]... Perrin Harkins
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/be... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/be... Perrin Harkins
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/be... Mike Lambert
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/be... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/be... Doug MacEachern
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniqu... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing tech... Stas Bekman