[Sorry for the delay: didn't notice this since it was sent only to the list] Eric Cholet wrote, in part: > > I never advocated optimizing at the expense of the above criteria, we > were discussing optimizations only. I certainly believe a program is a > compromise, and have often chosen some of those criteria as being > more important than performance savings. Sorry: I took your statement at face value. I'm well aware that you're not that shallow :-). - Barrie
- [OT] Re: [performance/benchmark] ... Perrin Harkins
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/ben... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/ben... Perrin Harkins
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/ben... Mike Lambert
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/ben... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [OT] Re: [performance/ben... Doug MacEachern
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing technique... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techn... Stas Bekman
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing technique... Barrie Slaymaker
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techn... Eric Cholet
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing t... Barrie Slaymaker
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniques Jeff Norman
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techniques Stas Bekman
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing technique... ___cliff rayman___
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing techn... Stas Bekman
- Re: [performance/benchmark] printing t... Matt Sergeant
- Re: [performance/benchmark] print... Greg Cope
- Template techniques Matt Sergeant
- Re: Template techniques shane
- Re: Template techniques Matt Sergeant
- Re: Template techniques Chris Winters