On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > > As far as benchmarks are concerned, I'm sending one mail after having > > displayed the page, so it shoul'dnt matter much ... > > Yeah, and everytime you get 1M process fired up... Nevertheless, in benchmarks we ran we found forking qmail-inject to be quite a bit faster than Net::SMTP. I'd say that at least from a command-line script qmail-inject is a more scalable approach. - Perrin
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fa... Doug MacEachern
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject'... Stas Bekman
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject'... Doug MacEachern
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject'... Stas Bekman
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject'... Matt Sergeant
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject'... Stas Bekman
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject'... Matthew Byng-Maddick
- RE: open(FH,'|qmail-inject'... Jeff Warner
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject'... Greg Stark
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject'... ed phillips
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails Perrin Harkins
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails Stas Bekman
- RE: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fa... David Harris
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails Greg Cope
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails mithun . b
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails Matt Sergeant
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails chicks
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails Jens-Uwe Mager
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails Andrew Dunstan
- RE: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails Shane Adams