On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Perrin Harkins wrote: > On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > As far as benchmarks are concerned, I'm sending one mail after having > > > displayed the page, so it shoul'dnt matter much ... > > > > Yeah, and everytime you get 1M process fired up... > > Nevertheless, in benchmarks we ran we found forking qmail-inject to be > quite a bit faster than Net::SMTP. I'd say that at least from a > command-line script qmail-inject is a more scalable approach. Quite possible, I was talking about the fat sendmail binaries :) _____________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apache.org/guide mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://apachetoday.com http://jazzvalley.com http://singlesheaven.com http://perlmonth.com perl.org apache.org
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject'... Stas Bekman
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject'... Doug MacEachern
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject'... Stas Bekman
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject'... Matt Sergeant
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject'... Stas Bekman
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject'... Matthew Byng-Maddick
- RE: open(FH,'|qmail-inject'... Jeff Warner
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject'... Greg Stark
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject'... ed phillips
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails Perrin Harkins
- RE: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails Stas Bekman
- RE: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fa... David Harris
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails Greg Cope
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails mithun . b
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails Matt Sergeant
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails chicks
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails Jens-Uwe Mager
- Re: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails Andrew Dunstan
- RE: open(FH,'|qmail-inject') fails Shane Adams