On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Perrin Harkins wrote:

> On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > > As far as benchmarks are concerned, I'm sending one mail after having
> > > displayed the page, so it shoul'dnt matter much ...
> > 
> > Yeah, and everytime you get 1M process fired up...
> 
> Nevertheless, in benchmarks we ran we found forking qmail-inject to be
> quite a bit faster than Net::SMTP.  I'd say that at least from a
> command-line script qmail-inject is a more scalable approach.

Quite possible, I was talking about the fat sendmail binaries :)


_____________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman              JAm_pH     --   Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/       mod_perl Guide  http://perl.apache.org/guide 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://apachetoday.com http://jazzvalley.com
http://singlesheaven.com http://perlmonth.com   perl.org   apache.org


Reply via email to