Re: Fwd: [speedycgi] Speedycgi scales better than mod_perl withscripts that contain un-shared memory

[Sam Horrocks]

 > Folks, your discussion is not short of wrong statements that can be easily
 > proved, but I don't find it useful.

 I don't follow.  Are you saying that my conclusions are wrong, but
 you don't want to bother explaining why?
 
 Would you agree with the following statement?

    Under apache-1, speedycgi scales better than mod_perl with
    scripts that contain un-shared memory