Re: Fwd: [speedycgi] Speedycgi scales a better benchmark

[Nigel Hamilton]

Hi,     
        I think some of the 'threatened' replies to this thread speak
more volumes than any benchmark.

        Sam has come up with a cool technology .... it will help bridge
the technology adoption gap between traditional perl CGI + mod_perl - 
especially for ISP's.

        Well done Sam!

NIge

Nigel Hamilton
______________________________________________________________________________


On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:

> On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Sam Horrocks wrote:
> 
> >  > Folks, your discussion is not short of wrong statements that can be easily
> >  > proved, but I don't find it useful.
> > 
> >  I don't follow.  Are you saying that my conclusions are wrong, but
> >  you don't want to bother explaining why?
> >  
> >  Would you agree with the following statement?
> > 
> >     Under apache-1, speedycgi scales better than mod_perl with
> >     scripts that contain un-shared memory 
> 
> Maybe; but for one thing the feature set seems to be very different
> as others have pointed out. Secondly then the test that was
> originally quoted didn't have much to do with reality and showed
> that whoever made it didn't have much experience with setting up
> real-world high traffic systems with mod_perl.
> 
> 
>   - ask
> 
> -- 
> ask bjoern hansen - <http://ask.netcetera.dk/>
> more than 70M impressions per day, <http://valueclick.com>
>