At 02:26 PM 5/22/2001 -0400, kyle dawkins wrote:
>On Tue, 22 May 2001 06:25, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 May 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
> > > I want/need a *Perl* solution!
> >
> > Well if you can pay for it... (still unemployed here and getting poorer
> > waiting for people to possibly say yay or nay on possible contracts...)
>
>Ummm... you guys could look at
>
>http://www.smartworker.org
Ummm... you could also read my first post on the subject which already
mentioned smartworker. Smartworker isn't what we need to accomplish what I
am talking about.
Smartworker has a great UI framework but it is a UI framework. It does not
operate at the level of application logic which is the level I wish to have
widgets operate under.
I realize this is a difficult concept to both explain and understand.
Hopefully the rest of my post will put it in a different nutshell.
>And if that's not your cup of tea, I should be releasing something sometime
>in the fairly near future that will be.
I am not sure. It would be great if that was the case!
Could you describe in a few sentences what you will be releasing? I don't
think you precisely understood what I was asking for or read my entire post
if you just forwarded me to smartworker again, so I hope you forgive my
skepticism. As mentioned, if what you can provide does what I want, then
that would be great.
What I don't want: Another HTML Widget library or another UI library
What I do want: A way of logically specifying an application-based widget
(eg post something saying <widget id='fname'> that is intelligent enough to
know how to render itself based on an application config.
