Stephen, I read your proposal and I like it a lot. I will help filling out the HTML::Widget::HTML* space (in your package structure suggestion). However, I like Gunther's suggestion for a namespace of Widget:: better than HTML::Widget::, because it will not be exclusively HTML, but WML, JS10, etc. But either one is fine with me. Sounds fun! -Adi Stephen Adkins wrote: > > Hi, > > I will step up to write this code. (if it is what I think it is) > I have responded to the message by beginning a requirements document. > > http://www.officevision.com/pub/HTML-Widget/ > > Please read it and send me any comments.
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Matt Sergeant
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Matt Sergeant
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages jay
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Cees Hek
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Stephen Adkins
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Stas Bekman
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Adi Fairbank
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Chip Turner
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages darren chamberlain
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Chip Turner
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Jay Lawrence
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Paul Lindner
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Gunther Birznieks
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Stephen Adkins
- Re: Real Widgets and Template Languages Chip Turner