> On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 01:36:07AM +0100, Robin Berjon wrote:
> > > * The first page ("Home") successfully validates at w3.org (HTML and CSS).
> > That's very good. Do the others validate as well (or at least, do you see any
> > reason why they wouldn't ?) ?
> On some of the deeper pages, Pod::POM generates HTML like this:
> <ul>
> text
> </ul>
>
> This isn't valid HTML (according to W3C), so those pages won't validate
> successfully.
> e.g:
> http://domm.zsi.at/modperl-site-domm/download/binaries.html
Maybe you should use HTML tidy to automagically fix broken HTML?
Another thing is that accessibility guidelines recommend using XHTML
1.1, since your HTML looks pretty clean and simple you might want to do
that instead of using old HTML 3.2.
Cheers,
--
== \______ =====================================================
/\____/\ IT'S TIME FOR A DIFFERENT KIND OF WEB
/ /\__/\ \
_/_/_/\/\_\_ Jean-Michel Hiver - Software Director
\ \ \/*/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 (0)114 221 4968
\ \/__\/
\/____\ VISIT HTTP://WWW.MKDOC.COM
== / ===========================================================
