Basel, Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2001, 19:02:12 .....................................
*see original email below* Hello Horng-Twu I was evaluating tools like silverstream then I dropped over Mason. I rejoiced a) Perl is my native IT language b) the system is not a blackbox like the products promoted with bells and whistles. After studying the excellent manual I went on a research on similar systems and I dropped over embperl. So I installed and compared. I preferred the syntax of Mason, the flexible way to build components, the caching ... it have to be said here that I choose Mason ... my arguments might be not independent :-) I can say that Mason is fine integrated in mod_perl. I use Dreamweaver for the publishers and the <% and <& commands are properly displayed as ASP-icons. I use it with Modules Apache::Session, Apache::Cookie, Net::SMTP ... Of course Mason-CM is cool! Best Regards Christian - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ..................................... "Is it the idea or the names of it's incarnations, praise that there is mod_perl and Mason|EmbPerl*" a newbie with first productive success. (* many contributors not mentioned here, sorry the list would be far too long ) ========== beginn original ========== Date: Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2001, 17:39:32 Subject: Mason vs embperl Hi, I am planning a website and considering either using Mason or using embperl. I already digged into Mason and am reading embperl manual. Can someone shed some light about these two tools with regard to ease of use, current development effort, and the future support level? Thanks, Steve Lihn =========== end original ============
