On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Perrin Harkins wrote: > Benjamin Elbirt wrote: > > Well, lets assume that I were to go with > > the shared memory option anyway... what would the pitfalls be / concerns? > > As mentioned before, you'd probably be better off with MLDBM::Sync or > Cache::Cache. You can try IPC::Shareable, but a lot of people seem to > have trouble getting it to work.
I agree with you 100% - file-based caches are generally as-fast and far easier to manage. Still, I can't resist the urge to plug my IPC::SharedCache module. It's much easier than using IPC::Shareable (or even the better alternative, IPC::ShareLite). -sam
