Taking this another step further, I don't get the impression that perlbal or pound will achieve the "temporary" caching on the middle-proxy server allowing the back-end server to get back to other requests.
Anyone know for sure? Sincerely, KAM > On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 13:24 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > My understand is that some people do caching on B simply to let A spit out > > all the data and let B handle the connection for as long as it takes to > > perform the transfer. > > That's right. It's very useful for images and multimedia files too.
