Chuck Murcko wrote:
> People are also playing around with dso load/unload ideas, but I'm not
> sure what's committed to httpd-2.0 at this point.
>
> Nice trying to hit a moving target from a rollercoaster. 8^)
>
> One more reason to get back in to the core: I'm going to call for a vote
> after we run as DSO and after beta 2 gets out or not. Sound OK to you
> guys for timing?
The proxy code is pretty much finished right now - getting it back in
the core would be great because it means I can focus on the cache :)
(Coding has begun...)
The separate DSO modules for ftp, http and connect were committed on
sunday - it was a really small change, as the hardwired code was pretty
modular on its own. It works for static, but Victor had hassles with
shared and said he would fix it.
In short, we have at least two maintainers, the code makes sense as a
multi-protocol router in addition to a proxy, and we need it build
tested :) We're ready.
Regards,
Graham
--
-----------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "There's a moon
over Bourbon Street
tonight..."
