Graham Leggett wrote: > > "Christopher R Key (Chris)" wrote: > > > Wouldn't it be better if this were named mod_proxy_ldap, for clarity I > > mean. Or will mod_ldap be capable of standing on its own without > > mod_proxy? > > mod_ldap has no dependancies on mod_proxy whatsoever. > > There is a module I intend writing called proxy_ldap.c which will allow > stuff like this: > > ProxyPass /test/ ldap://127.0.0.1/o=Example,c=UK? > > But this is the only overlap.
My mistake, when I read 'mod_ldap' I had assumed this to be the proxy_ldap you had previously discussed. -- Chris -- Guvf vf zl qvtvgnyyl raunaprq rapelcgrq fvtangher.
