In a message dated 8/24/00 3:46:42 PM GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< The Beatles weren't even that credible in the 60's, they were more of a
Blur/Oasis - and not exactly cutting edge. >>
Even to agree with your analogy (which I won't as I'm not a raving lunatic),
surely better to be the Blur/Oasis of the day than a sort of Stars in Their
Eyes version of Westlife (The Action fail to be the exact counterpart of this
meaningless covers band as they failed to have any hits of course). How
'cutting edge' were The Action exactly?! What exactly did they do that was so
revolutionary or innovative?
___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
