On Mon, Jul 12, 1999, Jeffrey Burgoyne wrote:
> > > Any idea of what performance gain to expect? We get about 15000 real hits
> > > a day, about 60000 total (including graphics). About 10% of those are SSL.
> > > I need to justify why we want to make the change to the web server and
> > > even a rough idea is all my employers need to see.
> >
> > I've still not seen any benchmarks, but the shared memory based session cache
> > is certainly a magnitude faster then the disk-I/O dependent DBM based session
> > cache, of course.
>
> Agreed. Is there anything else available for memory based caches for
> Apache? We have over a million documents (and dozens of online systems
> through CGI's). About 150 documents (all from the http side) account for
> 40% of our traffic and many of the graphics are fairly common among the
> pages. Even a small memory based cache would have signifigant advantages
> for our site.
>
> Regardless, would I see much advantage from implementing this feature? 95%
> of our accesses on the SSL side are CGI programs, and I'm not sure what
> the cache would store that would be useful. Since its session based, I
> assume some keys would be stored.
Youc an have a look at mod_mmap_static and mod_cache...
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
