On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 09:52:26AM -0700, David Rees wrote:
>
> Keep in mind the large performance penalty going with no shared ssl cache.
> Running some tests I've found the speed drops by about 30% when going dbm to
> none. shm was about 20-30% faster than dbm.
>
This is AFAIK only true if you're on an os that has decent (or at least usable)
support for a shared memory scheme - I'm guessing that MM_SHMT_MMFILE isn't
going to be faster than sdbm. Unfortunately MM_SHMT_MMFILE has started being
used on some Linux'es see (http://www.engelschall.com/sw/mm/ChangeLog.txt).
vh
Mads Toftum
--
`Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
