> According to Geoff's tests, it both increases performance and provides
> a more robust and efficient session cache. But I've no numbers at hand,
> although I know that Geoff has numbers (actually graphs). Geoff, can you
> make your benchmarking details for c2shm available to the people?
That would be great.
> > Is there any configuration parameters we need to be aware of, or is it a
> > drop in replacement for the current shm session cache?
>
> Oh, good catch: I've do add a little bit of documentation, even if it is
> experimental stuff (which usually has no entries in the user manual).
>
> No it is no replacement, it is an addition. The stuff can be tried by
> building mod_ssl with --enable-rule=SSL_EXPERIMENTAL and then using for
> instance
>
> SSLSessionCache shmcb:/tmp/cache(512000)
>
> The old hash table based shared memory session cache still can be used
> with
>
> SSLSessionCache shm[ht]:/tmp/cache(512000)
Looks good! If I get a chance I'll get it running on one of my development
machines and run a few benchmarks.
Thanks,
-Dave
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
