On Thu, Mar 22, 2001, David Rees wrote: > [...] > <lots of good info snipped> > > Thanks for the lowdown on both session caches, Geoff. > > It really seems to me that at this point, the shmcb cache should no longer > be part of the SSL_EXPERIMENTAL code, and even be made the default shm > cache. > > Has anyone had BAD experiences with it? > > What do you think, Ralf? Hmmm.. yes, I think we can try this for 2.8.2. Let's move it out of SSL_EXPERIMENTAL, but still do not use it by default in the configuration. I've arranged this for us for 2.8.2. Hopefully it will not blow away our legs.... ;) Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.engelschall.com ______________________________________________________________________ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best perform... Geoff Thorpe
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Geoff Thorpe
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? David Rees
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Max Clark
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Max Clark
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best perform... Brett W. McCoy
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Max Clark
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Max Clark
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Ralf S. Engelschall
- RE: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? John . Airey
- Re: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best perform... Ralf S. Engelschall
- Re: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Mads Toftum
- Re: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best performance? Geoff Thorpe
- Re: Which SSLSessionCache to use for best perform... Ralf S. Engelschall