On Thu, Mar 22, 2001, David Rees wrote:

> [...]
> <lots of good info snipped>
> 
> Thanks for the lowdown on both session caches, Geoff.
> 
> It really seems to me that at this point, the shmcb cache should no longer
> be part of the SSL_EXPERIMENTAL code, and even be made the default shm
> cache.
> 
> Has anyone had BAD experiences with it?
> 
> What do you think, Ralf?

Hmmm.. yes, I think we can try this for 2.8.2. Let's move it out
of SSL_EXPERIMENTAL, but still do not use it by default in the
configuration. I've arranged this for us for 2.8.2. Hopefully it will
not blow away our legs.... ;)
                                       Ralf S. Engelschall
                                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                       www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)                   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                            [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to