On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, R. DuFresne wrote: > I hate to reply to my own postings, but, there is a fifth <non-alchoholic > of course> I forgot to mention. Many of the CGI scripts one will find > posted for free use on the net are open vulnerabilities, and many of those > authors no longer maintain them. For that reason, people are far better > off to learn a scripting language and the intricities of using it in a > secure fashion rather then relying upon what they might find, poorly if at > all maintained, on the free CGI sites.
What this has to do with the original poster's problem -- heck, what ANY of your post has to do with the original poster's problem, or mod-ssl, is totally beyond me. It looks like you are using this opportunity to go off on a completely unrelated tangent about security problems and/or cross-site-scripting vulnerabilities, when the likelihood of the original poster's problem being attributed to these problems is extremely minimal. Unless you have something to contribute in the mod-ssl context I suggest you confine your security-related comments to an appropriate forum. - Julian ______________________________________________________________________ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
