This may well be the fat for your mail reader, but, on the better mail readers, I prefer pine or elm, when it asks how one wishes to reply choosing no on "Use "Reply-To:" address instead of "From:" address?" allows one to reply to both the list and the original sender. Why would one really need to Bcc: the list?
Thanks, Ron DuFresne On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Chris Cooper wrote: > Although modification of the subject by inserting an identifier e.g. > [xxx] helps when ppl BCC a copy to the list (not that that has been a > problem with this list however ;-) > > Re, > Chr!s > > - - - - - - > Chris Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Student Service Centre [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Edith Cowan University http://www.ecu.edu.au/ > Pearson Street Tel: +61 8 9273 8652 > Churchlands Fax: +61 8 9273 8000 > - - - - - - > > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/05/02 12:11pm >>> > > Thats a shortcoming on your part though, a proper mail reader can > accomplish this chore. > > Thanks, > > Ron DuFresne > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org > User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ admin & senior security consultant: sysinfo.com http://sysinfo.com "Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart testing, only testing, and damn good at it too! ______________________________________________________________________ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
