On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, paul priestman wrote: > 1. I have managed to install Apache 2.0.35 with mod SSL but it ony works > when i sepecify the servername as been the servers IP address instead of the > actual name - is this a bug or is this the way Apache in tended?
Do you mean in the actual ServerName directive? No that's not intended, but I've also never seen this problem. Can you email me a configuration snippet that demonstrates the problem? > Cannot load /opt/local/apache/apache_2.0.35/modules/mod_ssl.so into server: > ld.so.1: /opt/local/apache/apache_2.0.35/bin/httpd: fatal: relocation error: > file /opt/local/apache/apache_2.0.35/modules/mod_ssl.so: symbol > X509_INFO_free: referenced symbol not found > > Is this a common bug? Yes, it's a fairly frequently asked question. The problem is that you've built a shared mod_ssl against a static OpenSSL (ie, libssl.a and libcrypto.a instead of .so). That won't work because the way the build system currently works, OpenSSL is linked into httpd, not mod_ssl. httpd doesn't need the symbols from the OpenSSL libraries, so the static linker throws them away, meaning they're no longer available when mod_ssl is dynamically linked at runtime. Solution: use a shared OpenSSL. --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache HTTP Server Project ______________________________________________________________________ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
