a) you could try surfing the archives of this list since an arguable 10% of the traffic is either this exact question or directly relates to it.
b) you could use different ports
c) you could use different IPs. they're not *that* rare .. and .. it could be sanely argued that if you've got content important enough to protect using SSL, the cost of "using up" an IP is just part of the cost of making that _important_ information accessible.

-dsp


On Friday, Nov 8, 2002, at 18:30 Europe/London, Irving Carrion wrote:

Hello All!

Just recently I was able to get this mod-ssl library working on Apache.
It is working just fine.  Much thanks to the developer team.

Anyway my question is...

Currently I use name-based virtual hosts for all of our websites.

http://domain1.com
http://domain2.com

We would like to have the ability to get each domain a https address as
well like...

https://domain1.com
https://domain2.com

What would be the best method of tackling this, since mod-ssl doesn't
support name-based virtual host?

I've thought of using IP Based virtual host, but there isn't enough
static ip's to go around.  I've also thought of using
proxypass/proxyreverse to point it to an internal static ip.  Am I on
target with this?

I would really appreciate any help or suggestions ANYONE can provide.

Thanks!
IRV




______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)                   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                            [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)                   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                            [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to