* Orton, Yves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-24 10:55]: > > One last comment: if you want to make this a generically > > useful module, and unless your configuration is so complex > > that it needs a dedicate language to express it, then the > > module should instead just take a Perl datastructure. > > By that time what would be the difference between this and > MLDBM?
Hum? The fact that it builds a hash structure in a configurable way from a batch of DBI queries? Ie, the actual point of the module? -- Regards, Aristotle "If you can't laugh at yourself, you don't take life seriously enough."
