> * Orton, Yves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-24 10:55]:
> > > One last comment: if you want to make this a generically
> > > useful module, and unless your configuration is so complex
> > > that it needs a dedicate language to express it, then the
> > > module should instead just take a Perl datastructure.
> >
> > By that time what would be the difference between this and
> > MLDBM?
>
> Hum? The fact that it builds a hash structure in a configurable
> way from a batch of DBI queries? Ie, the actual point of the
> module?
Er, ok, maybe I misinterpreted "take a perl datastructure".
Yves
