On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 17:34, Simon Cozens wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Terrence Brannon) writes:
[snip]
> > Does it not belong to the CGI::* namespace?
>
> I don't think it belongs in any namespace once it's finally abstracted, since
> it's sufficiently high level that it's more of an "application" than a
> "module". (cf. AxKit, Struts, etc.) Then I get the fun of trying to think
> up a cutesy name!
Like POE too?
Interesting that you bring that up. I am currently preparing for
discussion a new collection of modules which is also an "application" as
well.
In my case, it is a Server/Integration platform for framework. In that
discussion (to be posted later this week maybe), I will suggest that
instead of creating a new TLNS for the application, perhaps all such
applications should eventually be moved to generic organizing TLNSes
like:
Server:: or
Platform:: or
Framework::
Perhaps we should have a discussion about what these should be, and
start to encourage folks to use them. Perhaps Application:: should be
added to this list. I see we have App:: but it has not be used for
this.
Lincoln
