On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Lincoln A. Baxter wrote: > In my case, it is a Server/Integration platform for framework. In that > discussion (to be posted later this week maybe), I will suggest that > instead of creating a new TLNS for the application, perhaps all such > applications should eventually be moved to generic organizing TLNSes > like: > > Server:: or > Platform:: or > Framework:: >
I think sooner or later, we're all going to have to bite the bullet and go with Java class naming conventions, like org::simon-cozens::MVC or maybe Larry's recommendation of using CPAN id as a top level. simon::MVC (or maybe au::simon::MVC) Otherwise, CPAN will continue to grow wide at the top level. -------------------- Christopher Josephes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
