> Bad name. That should be Net::FTP::Lite.
 My code has nothing to do with Net::FTP, it's not a subclass or
anything, I believe Graham Barr could get offended if someone was 
to associate my code with his masterpiece.

> I would suggest something with TLS in the name but you said that
> it's a testbed for new FTP features, so that wouldn't be its sole
 At first I proposed Net::TLSFTP, but it was very heavily criticized
around here. Additionally this will be just a FTP client implementation, 
working with both tls-enabled and old server, so I think Lite is just the
right term.

> Something like ::More might be better suited to convey what the
> module is supposed to do (ie support more FTP extensions than
> Net::FTP at the cost of reliability).
 Actually ::Less would fit better to the design of this thing.

> putting the code out there might inspire someone else to port the
> features to Net::FTP in your stead.
 That's what I'm hoping for.

-- 
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294  05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
We're giving you a new chance in life, and an opportunity
 to screw it up in a new, original way.

Reply via email to