On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Andy Lester wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 04:32:11PM +0200, A. Pagaltzis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > * Philippe 'BooK' Bruhat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-28 16:05]: > > > I thought I heard (or more probably read somewhere) that the > > > name was 6PAN? > > I don't think we need another CPAN at all. There's nothing wrong with > putting "require 6;" at the top of Makefile.PL and keeping everything in > one happy CPAN.
That means CPAN is going to have to parse it, and keep a record of the data so it splits development trees. Module authors will probably have to maintain dual branches of code between p5 and p6 for at least one year. I doubt that everyone will be able to jump on the perl6 bandwagon right away. -------------------- Christopher Josephes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
