On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 02:25:49PM -0800, Eric Wilhelm wrote: > # from Paul LeoNerd Evans > # on Sunday 31 December 2006 03:14 am: > > >EU::MM can't, but I believe Module::Build can. That said, the > > consensus on #perl/Freenode is that the latter isn't really ready > > yet, so just use the former. > > Is it not ready only because the consensus says it is not ready and > therefore it is not in use enough to be believed that it is ready? ... > Seems to me that it would be in the EU::MM maintainer's best interest to > *never* support that feature. Thus, you (and others) would have > motivation to use Module::Build and therefore the consensus would > change from "not sure" to "works great" (and Schwern will finally get > his wish of putting some concrete boots on EU::MM and waving to it as > it quickly sinks into the murky depths of the Willamette.)
In that case, perhaps I'll upgrade all my modules to using M::B, so as to be able to remark the build-time depenencies, and use any Test:: modules that I like, without upsetting things. -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ# 4135350 | Registered Linux# 179460 http://www.leonerd.org.uk/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
