-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andy Lester wrote:
> Are you going to organize the Conference On Namespace Decisions? Quoting http://pause.perl.org/pause/query?ACTION=pause_04about : # * Please,* talk to other people (comp.lang.perl.modules, # [EMAIL PROTECTED] or any mailing list that fits your problem # domain) before you decide upon the namespace you're going # to use for your module. Though I have had a couple of namespace registrations pending for weeks on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - for which I'm not blaming anyone given the tremendous amount of automated traffic there. So I figured that this list would be the place... Is it not? > Overall, far too much time is spent navel-gazing over Namespaces > And How They Should Be. As a novice CPAN author, I apologize (sincerely? You figure it out!) for wasting your time trying to do the right thing. > No. [B]oth [uses for the App:: namespace] are correct. Building a consensus, one opinion at a time. Thanks! - -- << Tout n'y est pas parfait, mais on y honore certainement les jardiniers >> Dominique Quatravaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBRktHNfTYH7KfeIIFAQItZwQApfXpnzfFk1sky6vQlrxsIkHy0yQBN/SL k8kfsQTRJahpX/vJ8ddzubgOlYiH8og19yMscDDBvqelLYT+i6DX0xSGWxD53gar m5hx4CvUJFD1QD0YNoJIxJVH2pCREohk6u77x6/VicDgCNI37kKNHacwgmc6tFW4 7zOmfZLRDPA= =K2vj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
