On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 06:00:12PM -0700, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> # from Jonathan Yu
> # on Monday 25 May 2009:
> 
> >I'd like to remove the Qt module from CPAN, or be able to take it
> > over.
> 
> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> That's a good question in general, but for Qt4, I'm inclined to say that 
> a better approach would be to use the 'Qt4::' namespace.
> 
> >I'm working with someone else on perlqt4 bindings for my Google Summer
> >of Code project, and the currently available version of Qt is from
> >1997 and of little use to anybody. (See: code.google.com/p/perlqt4)
[snip]
> 
> From my tinkering with it thus-far, it appears that Qt3 and Qt4 are 
> quite different APIs.  That is, current Perl code written for Qt (3) 
> won't "just work", right?

Errrrrm... I don't think that the Qt module written in 1997 would
support Qt 3 :)

Actually, from the module's README file:

  This release, PerlQt 0.03, is distributed under the LGPL and requires
  Qt-1.1 and Perl 5.004 (or a beta version). I have only successfully
  compiled PerlQt myself on my own RedHat Linux 4.0 system with a 2.0.28
  kernel, running Perl-5.00390, which is a beta-release of Perl-5.004.

I really don't think anyone ought to worry about backwards compatibility
with the Qt module currently on CPAN :)

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
Peter Pentchev  [email protected]    [email protected]    [email protected]
PGP key:        http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
This would easier understand fewer had omitted.

Attachment: pgps2xUpo9PaX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to