Its also largely irrelevant, since the 2.0 META spec will distinguish between "repo" and browseable interface.
David On Oct 31, 2009 6:38 PM, "Ricardo Signes" <[email protected]> wrote: * Burak Gürsoy <[email protected]> [2009-10-31T18:13:05] > I see that some modules have git:// protocol as the repo address in META.yml > and/or Pod. I don't... I'm strongly opposed. There might not be any HTTP URL to my repositor, even though a CVS or Git URL may exist. There's no reason to require things to be clickably just to support some closed-source application that is only one way to access things. -- rjbs
