Hi all,
Steve is proposing that we add the following parameter to Build.PL
installdirs => ($] >= 5.009004 ? 'core' : 'site'),
Is that the preferred way of handling this? The alternative is to just
set uninstall?
I'm also confused about the bit where we're installing two copies of the
html, (but I think that's a different bug) e.g.
Installing C:\perl5\html\lib\Module\Build.html
...
Installing C:\perl5\html\site\lib\Module\Build.html
--Eric
---------- Forwarded Message: ----------
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #20528] Module-Build installs into wrong location
with bleadperl
Date: Monday 08 October 2007 04:31
From: " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Queue: Module-Build
Ticket <URL: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=20528 >
On Sun Oct 07 14:18:12 2007, EWILHELM wrote:
> On Tue Jul 18 08:49:06 2006, SHAY wrote:
> > When manually installing (actually updating) Module-Build-0.2804
> > into my bleadperl installation (at patchlevel 28556), I found that
> > it got installed into the site/lib/ tree, rather than the lib/
> > tree.
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> I'm trying to dust-off the rt queue and it looks like this one may
> have been resolved in the last year. Can you please try with 0.2808
> from CPAN and/or the current svn and let us know if we still have
> this bug?
I tried both 0.2808 and current svn, and I'm afraid that they both
still have the bug. I installed them each into a fresh bleadperl
(@32066) and they both installed into site/lib rather than lib.
-------------------------------------------------------
--
Cult: A small, unpopular religion.
Religion: A large, popular cult.
-- Unknown
---------------------------------------------------
http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------------
