demerphq wrote: >> Of course, the real problem is our default @INC order is backwards. It >> should >> be site, vendor, core not core, site, vendor. > > Isnt the reason security? Although I am surprised that vendor is after site.
How does security enter into it? Locally installed modules (site) trump everything, the user has to be able to update stuff on their own. Vendor installed modules next. Finally the original core modules come last. This is like having a path of ~/bin:/usr/bin:/bin -- There will be snacks.
