Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > App:: is already used for 'things which support > applications'.
Which, we agreed, would not get in the way of real applications. > If you want to use App::, I think you'll have to build heavier > distros which have lib/App/Foo.pm. But, maybe program_name implies > script_files or something. I don't see a fundamental different between a small, single-file user program and a user program with its own library of application specific modules. To the end user, its a user program. Besides, I hate 'bin' since its a misnomer anyway. 'app' (note: lowcase letter a) would already be better. But I rather not start the discussion again. -- Johan
