On Sep 27, 2008, at 19:28, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
I don't think I've ever gotten perltidy to do what I want. I'm also
not
looking forward to having a "we needed to run perltidy" discontinuity
in `svn blame` -- does '-w' work for that or is there some way around
that?
I don't understand the question.
BTW, the emacs/vim lines at the start of the file should be an
indicator
as to how things are intended to be, but I'm not sure we ever even got
emacs to pay any attention to them, let alone textmate or notepad or
whatever.
It always prompts me, but doesn't seem to make any difference.
With the perltidyrc I have thus far managed to hate least, it looks
like
about a 5k patch. Which is smaller than the 7k from schwern's, so
I'll
check this in while you all discuss it and then I guess mess with
actually applying some patches or something.
/me updates…
Um, can we have --indent-columns 4 please? And no tabs? Also, ---
maximum-line-length=78 is probably the minimum it should be, not 72.
And first to bump the version number. At least, I think we should be
bumping it first thing post-release such that any changes will appear
in the META.yml, etc.
Yeah, makes sense to me.
Best,
David
