David Golden wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Elliot Shank<p...@galumph.com> wrote:
So, kindly don't put M::B into the build requirements if building M::B
itself.

Interesting.  The new behavior to automatically include M::B as a
configure_requires if there is no configure_requires probably needs an
exception from M::B itself.

I had to do this with our internal M::B subclass.

Reply via email to