module-build  

Messages by Date

• 2009/07/07 Re: M::B 0.33_06 is still broken in terms of versions. John Peacock
• 2009/07/06 Re: M::B 0.33_06 is still broken in terms of versions. David Golden
• 2009/07/06 M::B 0.33_06 is still broken in terms of versions. Elliot Shank
• 2009/07/06 Re: [OT] Which module which tells you your Build.PL/Makefile.PL are/not up-to-date? Ron Savage
• 2009/07/06 Re: [OT] Which module which tells you your Build.PL/Makefile.PL are/not up-to-date? Curtis Jewell
• 2009/07/06 Re: [OT] Which module which tells you your Build.PL/Makefile.PL are/not up-to-date? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/07/06 Re: version-AlphaBeta [was Re: version.pm 0.77 in M::B 0.33_04+ breaks a few distributions] John Peacock
• 2009/07/06 Re: version-AlphaBeta [was Re: version.pm 0.77 in M::B 0.33_04+ breaks a few distributions] Dave Mitchell
• 2009/07/05 [OT] Which module which tells you your Build.PL/Makefile.PL are/not up-to-date? Ron Savage
• 2009/07/05 Release timeframe for version 0.77 / M::B 0.34 [was Re: version.pm 0.77 in M::B 0.33_04+ breaks a few distributions] Curtis Jewell
• 2009/07/05 Re: version-AlphaBeta [was Re: version.pm 0.77 in M::B 0.33_04+ breaks a few distributions] John Peacock
• 2009/07/05 Re: version-AlphaBeta [was Re: version.pm 0.77 in M::B 0.33_04+ breaks a few distributions] David Golden
• 2009/07/05 version-AlphaBeta [was Re: version.pm 0.77 in M::B 0.33_04+ breaks a few distributions] John Peacock
• 2009/07/05 Re: version-AlphaBeta [was Re: version.pm 0.77 in M::B 0.33_04+ breaks a few distributions] Dave Mitchell
• 2009/07/05 Re: version.pm 0.77 in M::B 0.33_04+ breaks a few distributions John Peacock
• 2009/07/05 Re: version.pm 0.77 in M::B 0.33_04+ breaks a few distributions John Peacock
• 2009/07/05 Re: version-AlphaBeta [was Re: version.pm 0.77 in M::B 0.33_04+ breaks a few distributions] John Peacock
• 2009/07/05 Re: version.pm 0.77 in M::B 0.33_04+ breaks a few distributions David Golden
• 2009/07/04 version.pm 0.77 in M::B 0.33_04+ breaks a few distributions David Golden
• 2009/06/29 Re: Code freeze for 0.34 John Peacock
• 2009/06/29 Re: Code freeze for 0.34 Curtis Jewell
• 2009/06/29 Re: Code freeze for 0.34 David Golden
• 2009/06/29 Re: Code freeze for 0.34 Marvin Humphrey
• 2009/06/29 Re: Code freeze for 0.34 John Peacock
• 2009/06/29 Re: Code freeze for 0.34 David Golden
• 2009/06/29 Re: Code freeze for 0.34 John Peacock
• 2009/06/28 Code freeze for 0.34 David Golden
• 2009/06/28 Re: jpeacock: dual life modules John Peacock
• 2009/06/28 "requires" version restrictions: am I doing it right? Elliot Shank
• 2009/06/26 Re: configure_requires and build_requires David Golden
• 2009/06/26 Re: configure_requires and build_requires Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/06/26 configure_requires and build_requires David Golden
• 2009/06/26 Fwd: CPAN Upload: D/DA/DAGOLDEN/Module-Build-0.33_04.tar.gz David Golden
• 2009/06/23 Attribution for 0.33_03 contributions David Golden
• 2009/06/23 RT triage results David Golden
• 2009/06/22 Re: Module::Build 0.33_03 released David Golden
• 2009/06/22 Re: Module::Build 0.33_03 released Curtis Jewell
• 2009/06/22 Re: Module::Build 0.33_03 released David Golden
• 2009/06/22 Re: Module::Build 0.33_03 released John Peacock
• 2009/06/22 Module::Build 0.33_03 released David Golden
• 2009/06/21 Re: Bug triage help request David Golden
• 2009/06/21 Re: Bug triage help request David E. Wheeler
• 2009/06/21 Re: Bug triage help request David E. Wheeler
• 2009/06/19 Re: xs.t and ppm.t fail on statically-compiled perls David Golden
• 2009/06/19 Re: xs.t and ppm.t fail on statically-compiled perls Michael G Schwern
• 2009/06/19 Bug triage help request David Golden
• 2009/06/18 Weird thing I just noticed... (output in message, patch attached) Curtis Jewell
• 2009/06/18 xs.t and ppm.t fail on statically-compiled perls David Golden
• 2009/06/17 Re: Switch to git? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/06/17 Re: Switch to git? Curtis Jewell
• 2009/06/17 Re: Switch to git? Michael G Schwern
• 2009/06/17 Re: Switch to git? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/06/17 Re: Switch to git? Michael G Schwern
• 2009/06/17 Re: Switch to git? Thomas Klausner
• 2009/06/17 Re: Switch to git? demerphq
• 2009/06/17 Re: Switch to git? David Golden
• 2009/06/17 Re: Switch to git? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/06/16 Re: Switch to git? Michael G Schwern
• 2009/06/16 Re: M::B 0.33_01 puts CPAN.pm into an infinite loop. Elliot Shank
• 2009/06/16 Re: M::B 0.33_01 puts CPAN.pm into an infinite loop. David Golden
• 2009/06/16 M::B 0.33_01 puts CPAN.pm into an infinite loop. Elliot Shank
• 2009/06/16 Re: Switch to git? David Golden
• 2009/06/16 Re: Switch to git? David E. Wheeler
• 2009/06/16 Re: Switch to git? Michael G Schwern
• 2009/06/16 Re: Switch to git? Michael G Schwern
• 2009/06/16 Module::Build allow_mb_mismatch conundrum David Golden
• 2009/06/15 Re: Fwd: CPAN Upload: D/DA/DAGOLDEN/Module-Build-0.33_01.tar.gz David Golden
• 2009/06/15 Re: Fwd: CPAN Upload: D/DA/DAGOLDEN/Module-Build-0.33_01.tar.gz John Peacock
• 2009/06/14 Re: Switch to git? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/06/14 Re: Switch to git? David Golden
• 2009/06/14 Re: Switch to git? Curtis Jewell
• 2009/06/14 Re: Switch to git? Adam Kennedy
• 2009/06/13 Re: Switch to git? Michael G Schwern
• 2009/06/13 Re: CPAN Upload: D/DA/DAGOLDEN/Module-Build-0.33_01.tar.gz David Golden
• 2009/06/13 Re: CPAN Upload: D/DA/DAGOLDEN/Module-Build-0.33_01.tar.gz David E. Wheeler
• 2009/06/13 Fwd: CPAN Upload: D/DA/DAGOLDEN/Module-Build-0.33_01.tar.gz David Golden
• 2009/06/11 Re: Switch to git? David E. Wheeler
• 2009/06/11 Re: Switch to git? Adam Kennedy
• 2009/06/11 Re: Switch to git? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/06/10 Re: Switch to git? David Golden
• 2009/06/10 Re: Switch to git? David E. Wheeler
• 2009/06/10 Switch to git? Ken Williams
• 2009/05/18 Re: Module::Build vs Parse::CPAN::Meta on META.yml. John Peacock
• 2009/05/18 Re: Module::Build vs Parse::CPAN::Meta on META.yml. David Golden
• 2009/05/18 Re: Module::Build vs Parse::CPAN::Meta on META.yml. John Peacock
• 2009/05/18 Re: Module::Build vs Parse::CPAN::Meta on META.yml. David Golden
• 2009/05/18 Re: Module::Build vs Parse::CPAN::Meta on META.yml. Nicholas Clark
• 2009/05/17 Re: Module::Build vs Parse::CPAN::Meta on META.yml. David Golden
• 2009/05/17 Re: Module::Build vs Parse::CPAN::Meta on META.yml. John Peacock
• 2009/05/17 Re: Module::Build vs Parse::CPAN::Meta on META.yml. David Golden
• 2009/05/17 Re: Dual-Build Modules (What to do if both Makefile.PL and Build.PL exist) Jonathan Yu
• 2009/05/17 Re: Module::Build vs Parse::CPAN::Meta on META.yml. Adam Kennedy
• 2009/05/17 Re: Module::Build vs Parse::CPAN::Meta on META.yml. Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/05/17 Module::Build vs Parse::CPAN::Meta on META.yml. Elliot Shank
• 2009/05/09 RE: Problems with Windows John Dlugosz
• 2009/05/08 Re: Problems with Windows Michael G Schwern
• 2009/05/08 Re: Dual-Build Modules (What to do if both Makefile.PL and Build.PL exist) Michael G Schwern
• 2009/05/08 Re: Dual-Build Modules (What to do if both Makefile.PL and Build.PL exist) Adam Kennedy
• 2009/05/07 RE: Problems with Windows John Dlugosz
• 2009/05/07 Re: Dual-Build Modules (What to do if both Makefile.PL and Build.PL exist) Paul LeoNerd Evans
• 2009/05/06 RE: Problems with Windows Steve Hay
• 2009/05/06 RE: Problems with Windows Jan Dubois
• 2009/05/06 Dual-Build Modules (What to do if both Makefile.PL and Build.PL exist) Jonathan Yu
• 2009/05/06 Re: Dual-Build Modules (What to do if both Makefile.PL and Build.PL exist) Bill Ward
• 2009/05/06 Problems with Windows John Dlugosz
• 2009/05/05 Re: Dual-Build Modules (What to do if both Makefile.PL and Build.PL exist) David Golden
• 2009/05/05 install_paths Persistence Issue? David E. Wheeler
• 2009/05/03 Re: Module::Build version 0.33 out Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/05/03 Re: version 0.33 out Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
• 2009/05/03 version 0.33 out Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/30 More on Version Numbering David E . Wheeler
• 2009/04/27 Re: versions just won't ever be sane *and* compatible Adam Kennedy
• 2009/04/27 Re: version.pm 6 Ken Williams
• 2009/04/27 Re: versions just won't ever be sane *and* compatible Ken Williams
• 2009/04/25 Re: Why not v1.2 (was Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward) Adam Kennedy
• 2009/04/24 Re: version.pm 6 Michael G Schwern
• 2009/04/24 Re: Why not v1.2 (was Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward) Michael G Schwern
• 2009/04/23 Re: what do you want your version numbers to look like in 9 years? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/23 Re: Analysis of version number formats in the wild David Golden
• 2009/04/23 Re: Analysis of version number formats in the wild Adam Kennedy
• 2009/04/23 Re: Analysis of version number formats in the wild Adam Kennedy
• 2009/04/23 Re: what do you want your version numbers to look like in 9 years? Adam Kennedy
• 2009/04/23 Re: versions just won't ever be sane *and* compatible Adam Kennedy
• 2009/04/23 Re: Analysis of version number formats in the wild Andreas J. Koenig
• 2009/04/23 Re: Analysis of version number formats in the wild John M. Gamble
• 2009/04/23 Re: what do you want your version numbers to look like in 9 years? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/23 Re: Analysis of version number formats in the wild John Peacock
• 2009/04/23 Re: Analysis of version number formats in the wild John M. Gamble
• 2009/04/23 Re: versions just won't ever be sane *and* compatible David Golden
• 2009/04/23 Re: versions just won't ever be sane *and* compatible Zefram
• 2009/04/23 Re: versions just won't ever be sane *and* compatible David Golden
• 2009/04/23 [Fwd: version.pm synopsis thoughts and an additional version.pm affordance] John Peacock
• 2009/04/23 Re: Analysis of version number formats in the wild John Peacock
• 2009/04/23 Re: Why not v1.2 (was Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward) John Peacock
• 2009/04/23 Re: versions just won't ever be sane *and* compatible Zefram
• 2009/04/23 Re: version.pm 6 David Golden
• 2009/04/23 Re: Why not v1.2 (was Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward) David Golden
• 2009/04/23 Re: versions just won't ever be sane *and* compatible John Peacock
• 2009/04/23 Re: Analysis of version number formats in the wild David Golden
• 2009/04/23 Re: Analysis of version number formats in the wild Adam Kennedy
• 2009/04/22 Re: Analysis of version number formats in the wild Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/22 Re: version.pm 6 Adam Kennedy
• 2009/04/22 Re: Analysis of version number formats in the wild Adam Kennedy
• 2009/04/22 Re: Analysis of version number formats in the wild Adam Kennedy
• 2009/04/22 Re: Why not v1.2 (was Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward) Adam Kennedy
• 2009/04/22 Re: version.pm 6 Andreas J. Koenig
• 2009/04/22 Re: Analysis of version number formats in the wild Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/22 Re: Analysis of version number formats in the wild Austin Schutz
• 2009/04/22 Analysis of version number formats in the wild David Golden
• 2009/04/22 Re: [rt.cpan.org #45172] Add can_action to check for defined actions Ken Williams
• 2009/04/22 Re: versions just won't ever be sane *and* compatible Ken Williams
• 2009/04/22 Re: version.pm 6 Ken Williams
• 2009/04/22 Re: version.pm 6 Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/22 Re: version.pm 6 David E. Wheeler
• 2009/04/22 Why not v1.2 (was Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward) Michael G Schwern
• 2009/04/22 Re: version.pm 6 Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/22 Re: version.pm 6 Michael G Schwern
• 2009/04/22 Re: versions vs versions -- had enough? Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/22 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
• 2009/04/21 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Adam Kennedy
• 2009/04/21 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward David Golden
• 2009/04/21 Re: v-strings as module versions Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/21 Re: versions just won't ever be sane *and* compatible Zefram
• 2009/04/21 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
• 2009/04/21 Re: versions just won't ever be sane *and* compatible David Golden
• 2009/04/21 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward David Golden
• 2009/04/21 Re: versions just won't ever be sane *and* compatible Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/21 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/21 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
• 2009/04/21 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
• 2009/04/21 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/21 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward David Golden
• 2009/04/21 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Adam Kennedy
• 2009/04/21 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward David Golden
• 2009/04/21 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Adam Kennedy
• 2009/04/21 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward David Golden
• 2009/04/21 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Adam Kennedy
• 2009/04/21 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Dominique Dumont
• 2009/04/21 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/21 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward John Peacock
• 2009/04/20 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/20 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/20 Re: [rt.cpan.org #45172] Add can_action to check for defined actions Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/20 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
• 2009/04/20 Re: version.pm 6 Adam Kennedy
• 2009/04/20 Re: version.pm 6 Adam Kennedy
• 2009/04/20 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Andreas J. Koenig
• 2009/04/20 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward David Golden
• 2009/04/20 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
• 2009/04/20 RE: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Jan Dubois
• 2009/04/20 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/20 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward David Golden
• 2009/04/20 Re: version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward John Peacock
• 2009/04/20 version.pm -- recommendation for a path forward David Golden
• 2009/04/20 Re: version.pm 6 Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/20 Re: version.pm 6 David Golden
• 2009/04/20 Re: version.pm 6 Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/20 Re: version.pm 6 Eric Wilhelm
• 2009/04/20 Re: version.pm 6 David E. Wheeler
• 2009/04/20 Re: version.pm 6 Michael G Schwern

• Earlier messages
• Later messages