Dear Eric Thank you for your reply.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Zeno Davatz <zdav...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I am trying to debug mod_ruby to load in Apache for Windows. So far >> Apache for Windows does start with mod_ruby.so but it seems that httpd >> does not start correctly with mod_ruby enabled in Apache for Windows. >> >> The steps I took to compile mod_ruby for Apache for Windows 2.2.17 >> with MinGW are here: > > you should eliminate mingw from the equation if you're mostly > interested in the ruby side. The reason why I need MinGW is because Ruby was compiled with MinGW. I did compile mod_ruby with nmake on Windows. Works fine and Apache starts as well if I install Ruby via nmake as well. Not a problem. But I am dependent on the Oniguruma-patch and that patch can only be applied with MinGW at the moment. Also Ruby compiled with MinGW is faster then when compiled with nmake. Are you a Windows or a Linux User? I am asking because I think I am not that far away. I just need to understand the workings for Apache in Windows a bit better - as mod_ruby does compile with MinGW with the changes I pointed out. So if you can point me towards somewhere to debug mod_ruby for Apache on Windows so that I get my normal Server-Info as on Linux for: Request Phase Participation. I really think it is the Content Handlers that do not work. So there must be something different there in Apache for Windows compared to Apache for Linux. Best Zeno PS: The Ruby-Windows Installer is compiled with MinGW. And that is a great installer.
