|
thanks unfortunately, i was talking without knowing
what i was replying to. will vircom continue to update their filters
then? and I suppose after we upgrade on wednesday, i could actually turn
all of my custom filters off?? Just wondering if that would be the best
approach.
vince
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:46 AM
Subject: [Modus] When is 3.0 due out?
Well
this will hold down the tech calls.
--------------------------------------------------
Gene
DuCharme
SysAdmin
Inland Northwest Internet 509-935-8923
401 S. Park
St.
Chewelah, Wa. 99109
http://www.inwi.net
****E-mail certified Virus Free by
ModusMail****
************ http://www.vircom.com
***********
--------------------------------------------------
We get timed out. You must have the deluxe
plan if you are getting 16K. :-)
Cary Fitch
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:30
AM
Subject: [Modus] When is 3.0 due
out?
There must be a flurry of downloads going on, Downloading at a
whopping 16.6k
Might Install after lunch LOL
--------------------------------------------------
Gene
DuCharme
SysAdmin
Inland Northwest Internet 509-935-8923
401 S. Park
St.
Chewelah, Wa. 99109
http://www.inwi.net
****E-mail certified Virus Free
by ModusMail****
************ http://www.vircom.com
***********
--------------------------------------------------
If
you continue to use sieve filters then you are only creating work for
yourself. I have not had to worry about adding anything to sieve filters
since they got the SCA engine up and running.
The
reason the sieve filters are in your top ten is that custom sieve filters are
checked BEFORE the vircom SCA engine and in the old 2.x version they were
checked before the Vircom sieve filters..
Believe me and the rest of the beta testers.. you won't need sieve
filters :)
Ronnie
not me. I use tons of them and they are always
in my top ten list.
vince
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 9:35 PM
Subject: [Modus] When is 3.0 due out?
* This is the modus mailing list *
Hello
Ken,
While the sieve filters have not changed from 2.x they are
almost a
thing of the past.. I am only using 2 filters, one to bypass
some
specific addresses and another one to do input some variables for
new
viruses that may not yet be in the anti-virus engine.
The big
"spam kicker" is the new SCA engine.. You can read about it
here:
http://www.vircom.com/Modus3/
I
have no server wide whitelist/blacklist. I don't believe you
will
need them except for maybe a pesty person who likes to
harass...
Challenge/response is not used.
You can still select
the levels of scanning for viruses, spam and
attachments.
You will
be PLEASED!!
Ronnie
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Grimes
> Sent:
Saturday, November 01, 2003 10:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Modus]
When is 3.0 due out?
>
>
> * This is the modus mailing
list *
>
> While holding my breath for the November 3rd
release, we have
> a few questions for the beta testers if it doesn't
violate
> their NDA's. First, I read from the list that the
companies
> that are currently running the M3 setup have all
experienced
> great results with filtering the spammers known
techniques
> but are these due to the next generation Sieve filters
or are
> these the result of "server wide" whitelisting/blacklisting
> or challenge/response? If you answer to the first question
> is "yes", have you contacted all your customers to make them
> aware of the new challenge/response system just to pre-warn
> them of the possible delays in message receipt? Second
> question, of the companies and domains using the challenge
>
response is there anyone whom has put together a list of
> important
newsgroups that we could implement prior to
> customer complaints
about their Yahoo Groups now not being
> received because of their
non-response capacity? Thirdly, has
> anyone had experience with
third party mail relaying with
> regards to what additional
functionality can you filter for
> these servers? In other words, in
Modus 2.x we can select
> filtering of SPAM, VIRUS, or ATTACHMENTS
independently, will
> version M3 allow the additional the new
white/black or
> challenge/response options for relays? Fourth,
if you have
> implemented the challenge/response how does M3 perform
with
> massive spam attacks from the same IP if using different
> forged return addresses? In other words, if 20,000 messages
> come from 80.123.123.123 all with different forged return
>
addresses will it perform challenges for each message or will
> it
cache it's results and prevent wasted bandwidth by auto
>
"identifying" a new spammers IP that may not be blocked by
> the
RBL's yet.
>
> Just curious about these in advance,
> Ken
Grimes
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message
-----
> From: "Mike Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 4:53 PM
> Subject: [Modus] When is
3.0 due out?
>
>
> > * This is the modus mailing list
*
> >
> > We see fewer false positives now than when we
were using
> Modus 2 along
> > with spamassassin! The
nice thing is that users will be able to go
> > into their
quarantines and check for them and can add them
> themselves
>
> to their whitelist.
> >
> > MikeH
>
>
> >
> > ----
> >
> > I'm not a
complete idiot, some parts are missing!
> >
> > Mike
Herrera
> > Access One Online Services
> > http://www.access-one.com
>
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Robert
Sinclair
> > Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 4:40 PM
> >
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
Subject: [Modus] When is 3.0 due out?
> >
> >
> >
* This is the modus mailing list *
> >
> > What about
false positives? How well is it handling those?
> >
> >
----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mike Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent:
Saturday, November 01, 2003 12:58 PM
> > Subject: [Modus] When is
3.0 due out?
> >
> >
> >
> > **
>
> To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
> > word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
>
>
> **
> To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
>
**
To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
|
