|
If you
continue to use sieve filters then you are only creating work for
yourself. I have not had to worry about adding anything to sieve filters
since they got the SCA engine up and running.
The
reason the sieve filters are in your top ten is that custom sieve filters are
checked BEFORE the vircom SCA engine and in the old 2.x version they were
checked before the Vircom sieve filters..
Believe me and the rest of the beta testers.. you won't need sieve
filters :)
Ronnie
not me. I use tons of them and they are always in
my top ten list.
vince
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 9:35 PM
Subject: [Modus] When is 3.0 due out?
* This is the modus mailing list *
Hello
Ken,
While the sieve filters have not changed from 2.x they are almost
a
thing of the past.. I am only using 2 filters, one to bypass
some
specific addresses and another one to do input some variables for
new
viruses that may not yet be in the anti-virus engine.
The big
"spam kicker" is the new SCA engine.. You can read about it
here:
http://www.vircom.com/Modus3/
I
have no server wide whitelist/blacklist. I don't believe you
will
need them except for maybe a pesty person who likes to
harass...
Challenge/response is not used.
You can still select
the levels of scanning for viruses, spam and
attachments.
You will
be PLEASED!!
Ronnie
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Grimes
> Sent:
Saturday, November 01, 2003 10:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Modus]
When is 3.0 due out?
>
>
> * This is the modus mailing
list *
>
> While holding my breath for the November 3rd release,
we have
> a few questions for the beta testers if it doesn't violate
> their NDA's. First, I read from the list that the companies
> that are currently running the M3 setup have all experienced
>
great results with filtering the spammers known techniques
> but are
these due to the next generation Sieve filters or are
> these the
result of "server wide" whitelisting/blacklisting
> or
challenge/response? If you answer to the first question
> is
"yes", have you contacted all your customers to make them
> aware of
the new challenge/response system just to pre-warn
> them of the
possible delays in message receipt? Second
> question, of the
companies and domains using the challenge
> response is there anyone
whom has put together a list of
> important newsgroups that we could
implement prior to
> customer complaints about their Yahoo Groups now
not being
> received because of their non-response capacity? Thirdly,
has
> anyone had experience with third party mail relaying with
> regards to what additional functionality can you filter for
>
these servers? In other words, in Modus 2.x we can select
> filtering
of SPAM, VIRUS, or ATTACHMENTS independently, will
> version M3 allow
the additional the new white/black or
> challenge/response options for
relays? Fourth, if you have
> implemented the challenge/response
how does M3 perform with
> massive spam attacks from the same IP if
using different
> forged return addresses? In other words, if
20,000 messages
> come from 80.123.123.123 all with different forged
return
> addresses will it perform challenges for each message or will
> it cache it's results and prevent wasted bandwidth by auto
>
"identifying" a new spammers IP that may not be blocked by
> the RBL's
yet.
>
> Just curious about these in advance,
> Ken
Grimes
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message
-----
> From: "Mike Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 4:53 PM
> Subject: [Modus] When is 3.0
due out?
>
>
> > * This is the modus mailing list
*
> >
> > We see fewer false positives now than when we were
using
> Modus 2 along
> > with spamassassin! The nice
thing is that users will be able to go
> > into their quarantines
and check for them and can add them
> themselves
> > to their
whitelist.
> >
> > MikeH
> >
> >
>
> ----
> >
> > I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are
missing!
> >
> > Mike Herrera
> > Access One Online
Services
> > http://www.access-one.com
>
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Robert
Sinclair
> > Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 4:40 PM
> >
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
Subject: [Modus] When is 3.0 due out?
> >
> >
> > *
This is the modus mailing list *
> >
> > What about false
positives? How well is it handling those?
> >
> > -----
Original Message -----
> > From: "Mike Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent:
Saturday, November 01, 2003 12:58 PM
> > Subject: [Modus] When is 3.0
due out?
> >
> >
> >
> > **
> >
To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
> > word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
>
>
> **
> To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
>
**
To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.
|
