* This is the modus mailing list *

I think you can re-write your Sieve using COPY INTO, but you should ask
Marc (the Sieve Guru!).

---
Hospitality: Making your guests feel at home, even if you wish they
were.


(--------------------------------)         {((((((
(     Suneel Jhangiani           )        /_  _  )
(    Technical Director          )       ( .  .   )
( Inter-Computer Technology Ltd. )        ( /   )
(----------------------------------oOOo------------oOOo----)
( 40 James Street                Tel: +44 (0) 20 7486 9601 ) 
( London W1U 1EU                 Fax: +44 (0) 7050 678 978 )
( United Kingdom               Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]     )
(             Website: http://www.inctech.com              ) 
(----------------------------------------------------------)




-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Thornton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 11 November 2003 03:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* This is the modus mailing list *

The sieve filters all run before the SCA engine. There is currently no
way
around this. During the beta we again asked for the ability to have
sieve
scripts before and after the Vircom solution, but most of us intended to
us
that with SpamAssassin and that is no longer required. You have a valid
issue and I think you should take it up with Michael @ Vircom directly.

Mark Thornton
San Marcos Internet, Inc
512-393-5300


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken Grimes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 5:35 PM
Subject: [Modus] Question about new sequence of filtering?


> * This is the modus mailing list *
>
> We recently upgraded to the M3 from 2.x and we have a few customers
that
> need to monitor all emails sent to and from certain users in their
company.
> We currently are using a custom Sieve filter that Yves helped us with
and
> then calling a .bat agent to move the messages to the bosses inbox.
The
> problem we have is that after the M3 upgrade these customers are
complaining
> of massive amounts of spam flowing through our system.  My logical
first
> thought was they had selected a different level of filtering at the
user
> level or domain level and inadvertantly affected their users, however
I
have
> looked into this and it doesn't seem to be the case.
>
> I then remembered someone on the list mentioning a different order of
> scanning now with the SCA engine being introduced.  The only
ASSumption I
> can make is that the custom sieve filters are completely bypassing the
SCA
> and then causing the issues at hand.  If someone has seen this and has
a
fix
> or can confirm this please let me know.
>
> I personally haven't seen a single SPAM since the M3 upgrade and have
been
> extemely pleased with it's performance.  I used to get about 65
messages a
> day that would slip through the 2.x filters but now I have not
> one.....reminds me of when I first started surfing the web and no one
had
my
> email address.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Ken Grimes
>
>
> **
> To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.


**
To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.



**
To unsubscribe, send an Email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the body or subject line.

Reply via email to